IMRA Cycle 2026 — Reviewer Experience Dashboard

Beginning-of-Cycle (BOC) Survey  ·  Administered June 9–15, 2026  ·  Middle- and End-of-Cycle waves to follow

0
Responses
BOC
Survey Wave
Reviewer type
Experience
Showing all reviewers. QR/SR-specific items use their own response base.
This dashboard reports the Beginning-of-Cycle reviewer experience survey for IMRA Cycle 2026. The two filters above stack: reviewer type (Quality / Suitability) and experience (first-time / returning) can be combined, and every rating, NPS, and open-feedback pattern re-bases to the selected group. Questions asked only of Quality or Suitability reviewers always use their own response count, so a smaller n reflects survey branching, not missing data. When a combined slice falls below 30 responses, it is flagged so thin samples are not over-read.
0
Total responses
0
Quality reviewers (in view)
0
Suitability reviewers (in view)
0
first-time reviewers
0
Returning reviewers (in view)
0
Overall reviewer satisfaction
“I am satisfied with my experience as a reviewer” (Section 6.2) · mean of 1–5
0
Process is fair, effective & transparent
“The IMRA process is fair, effective, and transparent” (Section 6.1) · mean of 1–5
Content area & grade bands reviewed
Multi-select; reviewers could choose more than one band, so counts exceed total responses. (Not affected by the filters above.)
Every open-text response is shown in full. Each card opens with the patterns we identified across the comments for that question; the pattern counts recompute for whatever filter is active, so you can read first-time reviewers’ experience on its own. When a single experience group is selected, a comparison box highlights where that group’s themes differ most from the other group. Click a pattern to see representative quotes, or scroll the list to read every individual response.
About this dashboard. Source: IMRA Cycle 2026 BME Survey Responses (Beginning-of-Cycle wave, 1,018 responses). Agreement items use a 1–5 scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree); the bar shows the share who disagreed (1–2), were neutral (3), and agreed (4–5), with the mean at right. NPS items use a 0–10 scale (Promoters 9–10, Passives 7–8, Detractors 0–6). The reviewer-type and experience filters stack; slices under 30 responses are flagged. Pattern labels on the Open Feedback tab are keyword-based groupings applied across all comments to surface recurring themes; they are a reading aid, not a substitute for the verbatims, which are always shown in full. Comparison readouts show theme-frequency gaps of 8 points or more between first-time and returning reviewers. Sections with no Beginning-of-Cycle data (stipend & reimbursement, local classroom reviewer, kick-off training preferences) are intentionally omitted and will be added in the Middle- and End-of-Cycle waves.